MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,549
I lift weights 2-3 times a week, but still consider myself by no means a serious bodybuilder. In fact, it's safe to say I've never been hugely into sports of any kind, and haven't tended to hang out with people who are. I do it for the endorphin boost, for the satisfaction of knowing I look good in a tank top, for the strength when I need it for handyman sorts of projects, and for the mental effects (clarity and anti-depression).
Over the course of getting into weightlifting, I've encountered a good number of guys who are much more serious gymrats than me. And I've noticed they give a lot of lip service to 'isolating muscle groups', when designing and doing their workouts.
Why?
To me, this seems counterintuitive. If I do one exercise that gets many different muscle groups, it seems to me I'm saving time, and not risking overdeveloping one muscle while neglecting the one that counterbalances it.
I start off my every-other-day exercise routine by holding a pair of dumbells at my side while standing up. Then I supinate my wrists, flex my wrists, flex my elbows, and finally hoist the dumbells straight up over my head, before doing the same motion in reverse to bring them down. That's one rep. I do 3 sets of 15 reps. It's not the only upper body exercise I do (I follow with lateral row, bench press, stomach and back exercises, and dips, also 3 sets of 15 each). But it strikes me that this initial exercise works out every muscle in my arms and shoulders, and even many in my back, especially when you figure that I do it standing. Why would I want to replace this nifty lift with a big long series of machine exercises, each of which works on just one muscle group? My workout takes 25 minutes, and that's just fine by me.
After almost a year of this, I wouldn't say I'm built like a pitbull, but I have a physique like a cat who chases a lot of mice -- lean and wiry, but noticeably muscular. This is great. The mrs is happy my sex drive is healthy and I can move heavy boxes for her, but other than that, I've got no one to impress.
I almost posted this in Steroid Discussion, but then figured the response I'd get would be similar to walking up to a card table in a casino and asking how to play.
Over the course of getting into weightlifting, I've encountered a good number of guys who are much more serious gymrats than me. And I've noticed they give a lot of lip service to 'isolating muscle groups', when designing and doing their workouts.
Why?
To me, this seems counterintuitive. If I do one exercise that gets many different muscle groups, it seems to me I'm saving time, and not risking overdeveloping one muscle while neglecting the one that counterbalances it.
I start off my every-other-day exercise routine by holding a pair of dumbells at my side while standing up. Then I supinate my wrists, flex my wrists, flex my elbows, and finally hoist the dumbells straight up over my head, before doing the same motion in reverse to bring them down. That's one rep. I do 3 sets of 15 reps. It's not the only upper body exercise I do (I follow with lateral row, bench press, stomach and back exercises, and dips, also 3 sets of 15 each). But it strikes me that this initial exercise works out every muscle in my arms and shoulders, and even many in my back, especially when you figure that I do it standing. Why would I want to replace this nifty lift with a big long series of machine exercises, each of which works on just one muscle group? My workout takes 25 minutes, and that's just fine by me.
After almost a year of this, I wouldn't say I'm built like a pitbull, but I have a physique like a cat who chases a lot of mice -- lean and wiry, but noticeably muscular. This is great. The mrs is happy my sex drive is healthy and I can move heavy boxes for her, but other than that, I've got no one to impress.
I almost posted this in Steroid Discussion, but then figured the response I'd get would be similar to walking up to a card table in a casino and asking how to play.